<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Business Accounting Software: QuickBooks Vs. Sage. Vs. Peachtree. Vs. Microsoft Office Accounting – Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/</link>
	<description>A blog about fact &#38; opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliva</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-10665</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-10665</guid>
		<description>Sage/Peachtree is the worst.  Every year they make it more user-unfriendly.  I suppose they make it impossible to use without buying extra support systems - good for their own revenue stream - bad for businesses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage/Peachtree is the worst.  Every year they make it more user-unfriendly.  I suppose they make it impossible to use without buying extra support systems &#8211; good for their own revenue stream &#8211; bad for businesses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-8031</guid>
		<description>Sage versus Quickbooks

I used QB for many years and had a few complaints, mainly about having to re buy the software every few years (upgrade), poor support team knowledge and poor ability to integrate easily with other software. Through weight of publicity I decided to go with sage accounts 50 2010 because it appeared to integrate well with other software. It does integrate well but everything else is a nightmare. It really is surprisingly bad for such a well established software. QB came fully loaded with loads of functionality ready to go,with SAGE  I have to buy an extra license for more companies and other facilities I thought were standard, very poor drill down, making amendments is cumbersome, it keeps hanging and you have to have support because the software keeps falling over. I am staggered by how ungainly the product is. If QB ever got their integration sorted with a flexible CSV tool, I would move back immediately. For many years I didn&#039;t even have QB support, it was so simple and reliable. On reflection, QB constant chargeable upgrades are still actually quite good value (if they work)compared with Sage, support is still poor, but you don&#039;t really need it that often, but integration even with the addons is still cumbersome and risky. QB Payroll was fault free, seemlesly integrated and produced good monthly &amp; year end reports. I so miss this product!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage versus Quickbooks</p>
<p>I used QB for many years and had a few complaints, mainly about having to re buy the software every few years (upgrade), poor support team knowledge and poor ability to integrate easily with other software. Through weight of publicity I decided to go with sage accounts 50 2010 because it appeared to integrate well with other software. It does integrate well but everything else is a nightmare. It really is surprisingly bad for such a well established software. QB came fully loaded with loads of functionality ready to go,with SAGE  I have to buy an extra license for more companies and other facilities I thought were standard, very poor drill down, making amendments is cumbersome, it keeps hanging and you have to have support because the software keeps falling over. I am staggered by how ungainly the product is. If QB ever got their integration sorted with a flexible CSV tool, I would move back immediately. For many years I didn&#8217;t even have QB support, it was so simple and reliable. On reflection, QB constant chargeable upgrades are still actually quite good value (if they work)compared with Sage, support is still poor, but you don&#8217;t really need it that often, but integration even with the addons is still cumbersome and risky. QB Payroll was fault free, seemlesly integrated and produced good monthly &amp; year end reports. I so miss this product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew White</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>I have used most of the software mentioned above for alot of years now.

I have used quick books and find the older version much better than the new versions, as mentioned before the VAT caluations are a mess, the only way to do it accurately is to put the nominals into excel and work it out yourself.Everything else is fine a few complaints here and there. Really excellent for someone correcting other peoples work as it is really easy to edit transactions of all type.

Tas- Alot of it is good but it is let down with the end of year messing about and having to transfer balances etc. The inability to edit some transactions but you can edit others is a bit annoying and alot of time can be wasted messing about.

Sage- I cannot believe that people still use this, its a mess. About half your time is spent trying to get around its quirks and trying to figure out everything. 

Microsoft- I have only used this once or twice and it looks ok but i cannot really comment.

Others-

MYOB- A bit like sage but not nearly as infuriating. V difficult to run accounts and/edit reports etc. Some nice features though.

INRAX- An excellent online option. Software is delivered through Java is available online. No need for licences, one fee will do for all computers. Info is stored on there server in the UK and can be accessed from anywhere.

The program itself is visually v dull, but will surprise you postively. You can only edit dates and text which can be a bit annoying, but unlike, sage, tas or MYOb it won&#039;t take you all day to find the transaction you want to delete. Very good stock sysytem when up and running. The whole software can be fully integrated with a website, so would be an excellent option for online selling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used most of the software mentioned above for alot of years now.</p>
<p>I have used quick books and find the older version much better than the new versions, as mentioned before the VAT caluations are a mess, the only way to do it accurately is to put the nominals into excel and work it out yourself.Everything else is fine a few complaints here and there. Really excellent for someone correcting other peoples work as it is really easy to edit transactions of all type.</p>
<p>Tas- Alot of it is good but it is let down with the end of year messing about and having to transfer balances etc. The inability to edit some transactions but you can edit others is a bit annoying and alot of time can be wasted messing about.</p>
<p>Sage- I cannot believe that people still use this, its a mess. About half your time is spent trying to get around its quirks and trying to figure out everything. </p>
<p>Microsoft- I have only used this once or twice and it looks ok but i cannot really comment.</p>
<p>Others-</p>
<p>MYOB- A bit like sage but not nearly as infuriating. V difficult to run accounts and/edit reports etc. Some nice features though.</p>
<p>INRAX- An excellent online option. Software is delivered through Java is available online. No need for licences, one fee will do for all computers. Info is stored on there server in the UK and can be accessed from anywhere.</p>
<p>The program itself is visually v dull, but will surprise you postively. You can only edit dates and text which can be a bit annoying, but unlike, sage, tas or MYOb it won&#8217;t take you all day to find the transaction you want to delete. Very good stock sysytem when up and running. The whole software can be fully integrated with a website, so would be an excellent option for online selling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7784</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7784</guid>
		<description>Hi i am imran, there are lot of accounting software available on net and one can be really confused by all. which to decided. i belong to a law firm, if any one know which accounting software is appropriate for the law firm please inform me 
thanks
imran,
ps.hwel@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi i am imran, there are lot of accounting software available on net and one can be really confused by all. which to decided. i belong to a law firm, if any one know which accounting software is appropriate for the law firm please inform me<br />
thanks<br />
imran,<br />
<a href="mailto:ps.hwel@yahoo.com">ps.hwel@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accountancy services</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7449</link>
		<dc:creator>accountancy services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 16:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7449</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am new to the internet but I have been involved in accountant services for over 30 years now. Your article is brilliant reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am new to the internet but I have been involved in accountant services for over 30 years now. Your article is brilliant reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The new breed of small business accounting software</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>The new breed of small business accounting software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7141</guid>
		<description>[...] new breed of small business accounting software -Small Business Accounting Software: QuickBooks Vs. Sage. Vs. Peachtree. Vs. Microsoft Office Account...-Why Big Businesses fail to utilize Good Software-Asifism.com Server Changed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new breed of small business accounting software -Small Business Accounting Software: QuickBooks Vs. Sage. Vs. Peachtree. Vs. Microsoft Office Account&#8230;-Why Big Businesses fail to utilize Good Software-Asifism.com Server Changed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commie B</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7071</link>
		<dc:creator>Commie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7071</guid>
		<description>Thanks consumer, he has been reported and the article has been removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks consumer, he has been reported and the article has been removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: consumer</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-7031</link>
		<dc:creator>consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-7031</guid>
		<description>I think someone stole part of your work.

http://myabacus.wordpress.com/2009/08/25/quickbooks-vs-peachtree/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think someone stole part of your work.</p>
<p><a href="http://myabacus.wordpress.com/2009/08/25/quickbooks-vs-peachtree/" rel="nofollow">http://myabacus.wordpress.com/2009/08/25/quickbooks-vs-peachtree/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-6463</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-6463</guid>
		<description>Apparently this will get no further development. They also just cut off the payroll service, leaving you high and dry as its ridiculously hard to enter payroll manually (a deliberate design choice)

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/263395/microsoft-office-accounting-professional-2009#lastComment

Look elsewhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently this will get no further development. They also just cut off the payroll service, leaving you high and dry as its ridiculously hard to enter payroll manually (a deliberate design choice)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/263395/microsoft-office-accounting-professional-2009#lastComment" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/263395/microsoft-office-accounting-professional-2009#lastComment</a></p>
<p>Look elsewhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-6272</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-6272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used Quickbooks (UK) for 10 years now.  I am moving to Sage because the different accountants I deal with use it.  I like the fact that a Sage license will transfer when I upgrade / replace my computer.  Intuit support warned me to upgrade every 4 or so years as if I have a machine failure they will not validate my license to work on my replacement machine after a period of approx 4 years.  Sage and a few other companies when asked confirmed that they will revalidate licenses while they still had breath left.  As long as you don&#039;t mind having to pay to upgrade Quickbooks periodically I would recommend it as a simple tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Quickbooks (UK) for 10 years now.  I am moving to Sage because the different accountants I deal with use it.  I like the fact that a Sage license will transfer when I upgrade / replace my computer.  Intuit support warned me to upgrade every 4 or so years as if I have a machine failure they will not validate my license to work on my replacement machine after a period of approx 4 years.  Sage and a few other companies when asked confirmed that they will revalidate licenses while they still had breath left.  As long as you don&#8217;t mind having to pay to upgrade Quickbooks periodically I would recommend it as a simple tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commie B</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-6178</link>
		<dc:creator>Commie B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-6178</guid>
		<description>Try kashflow if you&#039;re in the UK or Xero in the US.  Reviews coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try kashflow if you&#8217;re in the UK or Xero in the US.  Reviews coming soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.asifism.com/accounting/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-6170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asifism.com/accounting-finance/small-business-accounting-software-quickbooks-vs-sage-vs-peachtree-vs-microsoft-office-accounting-%e2%80%93-part-two/#comment-6170</guid>
		<description>Alan,

you are right, the new version of Quickbooks 2008 and 2009 sucks really bad. you have to recreate all you templates because the new versions does not incorporate this and to make matters worse the taxs does not seperate like before, 
1 row for GST and 1 row for PST. they remove this from the new version. now i&#039;m looking for a new solution after wasting almost 4 days back and fort with QUICKBOOKS. 

DO NOT BUY QUICKBOOKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>you are right, the new version of Quickbooks 2008 and 2009 sucks really bad. you have to recreate all you templates because the new versions does not incorporate this and to make matters worse the taxs does not seperate like before,<br />
1 row for GST and 1 row for PST. they remove this from the new version. now i&#8217;m looking for a new solution after wasting almost 4 days back and fort with QUICKBOOKS. </p>
<p>DO NOT BUY QUICKBOOKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

