Posted by Commie B on July 29, 2008 at 10:42 pm
It is very common for people, even accountants, who haven’t been in the industry long enough, to ask what the difference is between a certified and a chartered accountant. In addition, the question that follows is that is it really useful to hire a certified or a chartered accountant for business, or is it just a waste of money? Well, the answer to the latter, in a nutshell, would be Scott Butterfield’s all fitting answer: it depends. I’ll discuss it in detail later in this article; but first, let’s get to the certified versus chartered.
Really, the difference between certified and chartered is what the dictionary says. However, the difference between certified and chartered accountants, is, well, irrelevant. If you didn’t already know, here’s another interesting one for you: there’s also a group out there called the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA). So, one accountant here is both chartered and certified.
I often hear Chartered Accountants picking on all other certified accounts, including FCAs, ACCAs, IMAs and CMAs etc., but there’s really no reason to be doing that. East of the United States, with an exception to Australia, the equivalent of a Chartered Accountant is a Certified Public Accountant. Therefore, the term Certified Public Accountant in the US is equivalent to the term Chartered Accountant in the UK and other countries that follow the UK convention. So, what is a CPA or a CA? Well, basically, if you’re either of these, you can conduct audits, and primarily audits for public, .i.e., stock exchange listed, companies. In a nutshell, that is the difference. Passing the CPA or CA exam is no evidence of an accountant’s technical ability or understanding of management accounting, tax accounting, or financial accounting. For what it is worth, I have met non-certified, non chartered accountants with more accounting acumen than CPAs and CAs alike.
Other ‘Certified’ or ‘Chartered’ Accounting Designations, such as the CIMA, ACCA, IMA, CMA etc. are management accounting designations, i.e., they prepare you more for operational and managing the business kind of accounting rather than the audit kind, which naturally makes them more, shall I say, interesting, challenging, creative, and less dull (if there is any such thing in accounting). Note, once again, that ultimately, a certification is a piece of paper, and you can get horrible qualified accountants too.
In many ways, accounting is a field like law. Just because one holds a license or a certificate, doesn’t mean one makes for a good accountant. Some lawyers are just plain good, and if you’re familiar with the legal system, good trial lawyers don’t really require any knowledge of the law; good public speaking skills here are essential.
Similarly, good accounting, and hence good accountants, is/are not measured by certificates or qualifications. What’s important in the case of a good accountant is the ability to translate numbers, debits, credits into money making business, and vice versa. There aren’t a whole a lot of accountants who can successfully do this, because a thorough understanding of business is required to become a good accountant. I say this, quite simply, because as is the case with public accountants (CPAs and CAs), their primary job is compliance with the law regarding financial reporting, which basically means you have to be able to read and follow instructions. Anyone can do that. It is the application of basic accounting principles across complex business models that can drive growth that separates an ‘accountant’ from a, erm…someone who just has a certified piece of paper.
Continue Reading
Posted by Commie B on May 9, 2008 at 10:03 am
Bank Reconciliations aren’t something that most management/senior accountants do anymore. They’re more of a check to make sure if everything adds up for compliance, and as important as it is to have to your bank account reconciled with your books, many businesses fail to do that.
I’ve had clients who haven’t done bank reconciliations for years, and truth be told, if you do it after five years, you will practically have to go back the five years to resolve the differences / problems. It’s one of those things which can unnecessarily spin out of control in a short amount of time, so it’s good to do bank reconciliations regularly, and know where your money is, before the gap between your business’ financial statements and your bank account widens.
So, the idea behind a bank reconciliation is basically to reconcile the balance in the Bank Account in your books/GL with your bank statement. Why would you need any such reconciliations? Well, for several reasons:
- At the end of every month, there will be checks (if you’re American) and cheques (if you’re British) that you have received, and booked in your GL, and even deposited in the account, but they have not yet cleared and, therefore, do not show up on your bank statement. The result of this is that your bank statement will understate your bank balance by the amount posted to the GL and not posted to the bank statement.
- Similarly, at the end of every month, there will be cheques/checks that you have sent out to your vendors, but they have not yet cashed or deposited those cheques at their end. The result, your bank statement will be overstated, whereas your GL will be understated compared to the bank statement.
- Bank charges. These are very typical of first world banks. Charges for check books, debit cards, remittances, wire transfers, cheque processing, etc. etc. You do not get an invoice for such transactions (or any others that are deducted from your account via a standing order), and you, therefore, need to book these to your GL when you see them on your bank statement (given that they are valid and that the bank is not ripping you off and somebody’s not having a party with your money that you’re not aware of).
- Compliance. Try and get an audit done without a bank reconciliation; it’s not going to happen. Even small businesses, who may occassiaonally require a financial audit of their books and financial statements for lenders, etc. will need bank reconiliations.
So, what exactly is a bank reconciliation? The goal with a bank reconciliation (or a bank reconciliation sheet, used to complete a bank reconciliation) is to show both the bank and GL transactions, and bridge the gap between the two numbers. At the end of completing such a reconciliation, you will come up with a reconciled balance, which will show entries that appear on the GL but not on the bank statement and vice versa. What you will need to do now is book all those entries which appear on the bank statement but not on the GL in your books. The result of this booking should give your bank account in the GL the same balance as the one on the bank reconciliation sheet.
To make your life easier, I’ve compiled a spreadsheet (which you can download at the end of this article), using which, coupled with the following instructions, you can easily complete a bank reconciliation.
What you need?
1. Bank Statement for the period being reconciled
2. Your Bank Account printout from your GL listing all transactions posted to the bank account in questions
3. The Bank Reconcliation spreadsheet (available for download at the end of this article)
Here’s what you need to do:
Compare the bank statement and the GL printout line by line in chronological order. Your GL printout should be in chronological order just like your bank statement, but if it is not, simply export it into excel and do a Data > Sort by the appropriate column.
So, you go through both the bank statement and GL line by line. Cross out items (identical items / entries) that appear both on the GL and the bank statement. Leave blank, highlight / mark or make note of items / entries that appear on the GL and not on the bank statement and vice versa.
Now you enter these items in the appropriate area in the spreadsheet. If you have more line items to enter than the spread sheet has, you can simply add more rows and adjust the summation formula accordingly. No complex formulas have been used in the making of this spreadsheet.
That’s it, if you’ve entered the right numbers in the right places against the right entries, your bank reconcliation will balance, and you just make the appropriate entries in your GL, entries for items that appear in the bank statement and do not appear in the GL.
Sounds simple enough? It is.
Any problems. Feel free to post them as comments.
Click here to download the Bank Reconciliation Spreadsheet.
Continue Reading
Posted by Commie B on March 7, 2008 at 1:58 am
Lots…
Last few days I have kept pretty busy, and I think it’s going to get like that, but I’m going to work Asifism.com into my schedule too.
I’m currently setting up a new business (more information on that will come soon). I’m also in the process of working out with a franchise issuing organization to purchase an accounting/bookkeeping franchise (more information on that will follow too). In addition, I am studying for CIMA and actively working on DesignerPottery.com (http://www.designerpottery.com/blog). I need some help on this, so if this even remotely sounds like something you can help out with, please visit the blog and give me insight, feedback, or simply contact me for how you can help.
Of course, business is my priority. As part of marketing my accounting/bookkeeping consultancy, I am launching, in conjunction with VAFTA Solutions Limited (http://www.vafta.com) an accounting blog, which will start with me completing the second part of the accounting software article, where I will discuss and compare various accounting software. Consider it a QuickBooks Vs. Peachtree Vs. Sage Vs. Microsoft Office Accounting. Oh, and for the record, Sage sucks. Don’t buy it if you can avoid it. Get Quickbooks or Peachtree or Microsoft Accounting. They’re all three about 10 times better than Sage.
Basically, this new blog/section is about the following: many modern accountants/bookkeepers are able to use accounting software, but really, when you have a complex issue at hand, you always need to go back to your basic T-Accounts, i.e., the debits and the credits. I’ll start off with the basics, and as I study for CIMA, I’m also getting a refresher of all the basics. In addition, and this is probably going to be extremely productive and useful for some accountants or professionals, as I embark upon this journey to discuss accounting in hopefully an unambiguous way, unlike any other damn book (published by CIMA or Gleim or Kaplan or anyone else), I will point out the differences in the way the accounting is done under US GAAP and the way it is done under UK GAAP / IFRS. This itself is a bit of gap bridging activity for me, since almost all of my practical experience is US GAAP driven, and now I have to adjust to the IFRS. Please note that the differences arise at the basic level, and are carried through to the final stages, and there are problems if you hold a reluctant frame of mind about how the accounting needs to be done. Consistency past borders is hard to find in this profession, and that can get frustrating.
In addition, I will discuss some of the certification processes along the way. I am a member of the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) in the USA, although I never really got a chance to sit for the Certified Management Accountant (CMA) exam while I was there. In the UK, CMA doesn’t mean much, but CIMA means everything for good financial & management accountants. So, I’m indulging in CIMA now, unfortunately, from the basics, and I’ll explain why when discussing the certification.
However, stay put for this new set of articles and lessons in the Accounting & Finance Category of Asifism.com. In addition, these lessons may be reproduced on http://www.vafta.com/blog, but I’m not so sure of that. If anyone is interested in writing on accounting, please be sure to email me at asif[at]asifism.com for more information.
For those of you who come here for QuickPlay. That will keep coming, as will more information regarding it that comes irrelevant. I’ve had some new problems with my HP dv2415, and I haven’t really had time to key that in, but I’ll be discussing that too. More Memoirs of the HP dv2000 series! Please, the offer for the DVB Card/Software article is still on the table, but unless people are serious about it, we won’t be spending time putting that together. Please vote on that:
Loading ...
In addition, if you have hard success or failure with HP QuickPlay via Asifism.com, please let me know and leave comments on what needs to be changed.
Of course, as I get time inbetween, I’m also dying to give my cynical political insight on things like the triple victory of Hillary Clinton over Obama (in Texas, Ohio etc.). And of course, I’m dying to put down a few lines on Bush backing up McCain, and John McCain being very happy about it. Like anyone cares what George Bush thinks anymore!
Well, that’s all for now folks! Let’s get this rolling!
Continue Reading
Posted by Commie B on February 8, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Small Business has seen a dilemma when it comes to choosing and using an accounting package. The UK is primarily dominated by SAGE. The US sees plenty of QuickBooks and Peachtree, but there are others in the market too. The problem, however, is that although these three pieces of software along with the others provide a basis for double entry accounting, they don’t have what it takes to get true accounting automation, and I have to sadly say (now that I am in the UK) that SAGE is probably the worst out of the three.
All small business accounting packages suffer from similar diseases; not enough drill down user functionality, weak, if any, accountability for prepayments, deployment over multiple locations (without actually paying out of your nose) etc. etc. Despite all of that, I think it would be beneficial to review and discuss:
1. What is it that will make for a good Accounting Package, and
2. Which should you choose: SAGE, Peachtree or Quickbooks?
I’ve tried to look for reviews on the internet comparing the three accounting software packages, but I’ve had no luck. I have found some interesting articles that point to the shortcomings of SAGE or Quickbooks, but I’ve yet to see something that ideally tells you what’s good from a small business owner, accountant or book keeper’s point of view. There’s a good article http://nothing.tmtm.com/archives/2582 that discusses some of the fallacies of SAGE, and I totally agree with the writer, although I’m not sure small businessmen will ever be able to handle their accounting without the help of an accountant or bookkeeper. The double entry system is to blame for part of that; and people’s unwillingness to sit, think, and learn, given the lack of availability of time to the small business owner will make it impossible for business owners to use any accounting software independent of a professional virtually impossible.
As a professional accountant with a degree in Information Systems, I have a slightly different point of view about what accounting software should do and how it should work. I’ve also been a small business owner, and I’ll tell right off the bat that when I ran my own business, I could not take the time every day to sit down and update my books; hell, I couldn’t take out the time once a month, and I fell behind on my books drastically; but I can fix them come year end, because I know exactly what it takes. What about someone who doesn’t?
If software or accounting automation were to function ideally, whenever you made a sale or provided a service, the appropriate entry would be made automatically and it would update your books. Well, you can get part of that in a retail business, even with small business software like the QuickBooks POS terminal, but it still won’t do your depreciation, purchase of fixed assets, bill payments, etc. etc. automatically, even if you paid for and used every damn service you can subscribe for through Intuit over the internet. On the other hand, if you have a service business, well, you’re totally screwed! You’ve got to do everything yourself. The point is, for those of you who are thinking that “Ah! There will be accounting software that will do everything on its own one day,” the answer is no. That cannot be.
That’s basically because firstly the wonderful governments of the first world want extreme compliance with some rather unnecessary laws and regulations, and software will never be allowed to automate everything simply because a human being needs to be held responsible if something goes wrong. Second, we accountants love being in control. Corporate Accounting, for instance, can be the most dull job you have on earth, but the ability to tell someone “do your work and do it right, or no pay for you, buddy!” is excellent. Well, I like having my control over the money anyway. Third, and most important, the whole purpose of a double entry book keeping system is reconciliation. Everyone’s work is reconciled by another until an auditor signs off on it, and even then, sometimes the government comes in to reconcile that. As long as the basis and purpose of accounting is reconciliation and accountability thereof, accounting software will not become fully automated or “accountant-less.” Besides, the way I fathom fully automated accounting software, no small business could possibly afford it today.
Enough dreaming! Now, let’s get down to business. In the real world, what is it that a small business, say, any business ranging from GBP 200,000.00 in revenue to GBP 10,000,000.00 in revenue per year should look for? First and foremost, as discussed earlier, something that cuts down on accountant or book-keeper time. Now, what exactly does that mean? Things that a small business will primarily need a book-keeper or accountant for are:
1. Accounting for prepayments
2. Payroll accounting and returns
3. Depreciation for GAAP and Tax purposes
4. Minimizing tax legally
5. Useful, sensible reporting
1. Prepayments, if you think of them mathematically or simply, are nothing complicated. Even in simple double entry accounting, prepayments aren’t too complex. The concept is rather linear; if you pay for something before it was due, it becomes a current asset for the time being, automatically being written off against a liability that will arise in the future. So, what exactly is the simple accounting behind this? Say you pay your office rent 3 months in advance. The rent for the whole quarter becomes due on the first day of the beginning of the quarter. In such a scenario, in double entry accounting, you will:
a. You will cut a check for three months rent on the 1st day of the quarter, say, the 1st of January, for 3 months (from January 1st to March 31st, 20xx). Assume here that your monthly rent is 1,000, and the 3 months’ rent is, therefore, 3,000.
b. In your books for January, you will make an entry for rent payment of three months on January 1st, crediting your cash account with 3,000, debiting your Rent Expense account for 1,000 (for the month of January) and Prepaid Rent/Prepaid Expenses Account for 2,000 (for the prepaid rent for February and March).
c. When you prepare your financial statements at month end, you will show 1,000 in Rent expense on your Profit & Loss Account (if you’re in the UK, Asia or most of the Middle East) or Income Statement (if you’re in the US) and 2,000 in the current assets section on the balance sheet.
d. In the month of February, you would credit the prepaid expense account and debit the rent expense account with 1,000 each, respectively. Your balance sheet in February month will show only 1,000 in prepaid assets. Repeat for March.
e. You’re done!
As you can see, this isn’t really too complicated. The accounting is simple, but you have to be familiar with basic double entry debits and credits to do it right. I can’t tell you how many professional accountants screw up prepaid accounting, so let’s not blame small business owners for pulling their hair out with unusual and possibly unnecessary debits and credits for something as simple as a rent prepayment. You’d think that paying it for 3 months in advance you wouldn’t have to worry about for 3 more months. Unfortunately, that’s not the case in financial accounting.
2. The usual second hang-up in small business accounting is payroll. Now payroll is not rocket science; it is systematic and the method is well documented. But, undoubtedly, payroll is a very tedious and boring part of corporate accounting. Keeping track of different and changing income levels with different tax brackets and doing quarterly returns can, quite frankly, be a bitch. It’s not difficult; it’s just bogus. However, a small business can simply choose to outsource this function altogether. Depending on where you are and how many employees you have, you can outsource payroll accounting and disbursement for as little as $100 per month per employee or $ 300 per month in total. Please don’t start emailing me about where to find companies that can do this for you. Look around in your city. Ask a local accountant or check with someone like TriNet if you’re in the US. If you’re in the UK, well, you can contact me.
3. Here’s another subject I’ve seen small business owners get heart burn over. I have worked with clients and bosses who were shattered because straight line depreciation as per GAAP put a serious dent in their profits. It took a lot to explain to them that this was good for tax purposes (although that may not be true since you have to use government compliant depreciation methods depending on which country you’re in) and it didn’t really matter for scoring points in front of your bank, friends, or date. But managing statements that reflect and don’t reflect different types of depreciation, depending on who the financial statements are being made for can once again, be a boring and tedious task; one most small business owners would want to rid themselves off. Welcome to the real world; different institutions want your fixed assets accounted for differently. How would you calculate the life of each asset? How many years to break it down over? What percentage do you have to depreciate it according to the IRS? Treat it as real property or not? How about land and buildings? Who the hell is going to keep track of all the assets in your business? Computers, desks, chairs, fittings, etc. etc. Sounds like a full time job, doesn’t it? It is painful!
4. Corporate Income Tax, Sales Tax and/or VAT. Such wonderful terms. I assure you, even those of us who love taking your money for doing your taxes hate doing them just as much as you do. Again, although taxes can get really complex, they’re typically, for a small business owner, not too bad. That doesn’t mean they can be. When small business owners start making personal payments from the company account and start charging gifts, kids tuition, cars, rent, alimony etc. etc. for their extended family to the company account, the tax business can get rather nasty, especially if you don’t stay on top of it at month end, and tackle it while you can with your quarterly payroll return. However, I will say that even the tax return system is relatively developed. There is TOO MUCH documentation available on how to complete and file your return, and some software will typically be pretty helpful. But to maximize your tax benefit, you do need some tax craftsmanship, and that only comes with experience and knowledge of accounting and taxation. And who in the world will spend his time studying tax law and procedure unless he’s getting paid money to do it? No one. You’re better off getting professional help for this from the get go. Plus, by doing so, you don’t have to worry as much about the tax department coming down your ass for making simple mistakes. However, do keep in mind that if there is a mistake, and even if you have a chartered accountant sign off on it, it’s going to be the small business owner’s ass if there’s a problem. You need an accountant for this; I can’t stress how bad it is when you’ll get penalized $ 1,200 for trying to save $ 750 you could have paid an accountant initially, because second time around, you’ll be paying the 1200 and the 750. Do the Math!
5. It’s great to get professional looking P&Ls, Income Statements, Balance Sheets, Cash Flow Statements, etc. etc. etc. It’s very good for the small busiess owner’s ego to see a professional set of financial statements and reports with the business logo on it, but to most small business owners, the typical financial reports can be pretty damn useless. They’re a good measure to see how you’re competing with the big business on numbers, but useful reports that explain cash flow or budgets, that compare pro formas with actuals, present value and future value statements and calculations, and other such reports require some planning and thinking, and definitely need some kind of a financial background, if not an accounting one. It takes quite an accountant to explain a cash flow statement. A typical cash flow statement made under US GAAP is very user unfriendly, and I’m not sure a small business owner would want to spend his time on figuring out what exactly it means. That’s why you will need an accountant to explain or simplify any typical, standard reports that your accounting software may generate. Of course, if you’re happy without knowing what’s really going on, you probably don’t need to understand any of it. But for a growing and developing small business, accurate, useful financial reporting that provides valuable information, not data, is vital. It the job of a financial or management accountant to convert this data into information, and then present it to the man in charge of the business.
Now that we have established that a small business needs a professional accountant, or professional help, let’s discuss what it is that the accounting software in the market should about the above to minimize or reduce the use or functions of an accountant to reduce the overhead associated with having an accountant.
The Accounting Software Wishlist not available in existing software – by today’s standard
1. Let us first start of with drill down functionality. Let’s say, you have your balance sheet on the screen, and the figure for current liabilities looks a little out of whack (doesn’t it always?), and you want to see what makes up the massive number of US $ 2,,467,589.45. Well, if you were using SAGE, or any other third class third party accounting software, you would hear your PC make a buzzing error noise, that annoying sound that it makes on different occasions for different problems that sounds something like “tun`!” That’s because there is a lot of commercial software out there which will not allow for any drill down functionality, and that makes for very user unfriendly software, even for us accountants. I don’t know why it’s so difficult for us to be able to double click on our statements and reports, and have either the relevant ledger accounts pop up or a simple list of the items that are making up that number. Sometimes a typical, or what we may think of as typical, entry in a software does NOT come up with the desired result on the balance sheet or P & L. That simply means that the user doesn’t think the exact same way as the person who designed the software, and that’s a problem, because most johnnys who design the software have little or nothing to do with accounting. By the way, QuickBooks, Peachtree and Microsoft Office Accounting all provide for this. I’m not sure about MYOB, but I assure, SAGE should get fined for something as stupid as this. They’ve even bought Peachtree, but they refuse to learn from it.
2. Here’s what these software providers need to decipher: are you making the software for small business owners or are you making it for accountants? This question is key before we can tackle the ever famous ‘accounting for prepayments’ issue. Up to this day, all major small business accounting software does half and half. Take SAGE for instance, they have an option to account for prepayments, but it’s so horrid and hard to figure out that any normal person will be pulling his/her hair out to figure out how it works. Most irritating is the fact that you can’t see the effect of your prepayment entry until you decide to go in and CLOSE the month. So, if you were to look at your statements before actually closing the month to make sure there weren’t any mistakes, you’re screwed. Worst yet, if this is a tactic for security and internal controls in a business, it fails miserably. You won’t know what you’ve until you close the month, and then you’ll have to make a bunch of adjusting entries to fix up anything you may have screwed up. That will only cause more confusion for someone trying to pick up on erroneous accounting behavior.
It would, in fact, be simpler to add a prepayment section to the payment area, and simply ask the user how much of the amount being paid is prepayment, and then the appropriate entries could be made into the GL or PL accordingly automatically. Of course, that’s if you’re designing the software for the small business owner.
On the other hand, if you’re making it for accountants, and you’re dumb enough to not be able to figure out how to account for it automatically, why don’t you simply state that in the How-tos instead of giving a long lecture full of bullshit in Help Menu, and simply let us accountants make journal entries to account for prepayments. Well, it’s not like the software is stopping you. But that’s how I account for prepayments anyway. The prepayment options are buggy and sketchy at best, and quite frankly, even if you figure them out, they won’t work properly in Peachtree, QuickBooks, or SAGE. Microsoft has made a bit of an effort to incorporate prepayments into their new software, and it’s a decent attempt. However, it could require some further cleaning up.
3. Multiple Locations. I’ve deployed both Peachtree and QuickBooks over multiple locations. I haven’t even tried with SAGE, and given my low opinion of it thus far, I fear the day a client or an employer will ask me to do this. Of course, deploying over a network or over the internet is not as useful as one would assume. If you actually wanted to keep track of two locations from the two different locations, and have the software update everything automatically, wouldn’t that just be great.
The problems with deploying software like Peachtree and QuickBooks over a network or VPN are simple. The number of simultaneous user is limited (for many functions to one user only), and if you’re keeping track of say, multiple warehouses with equipment, your inventory management will get really screwed up. You’ll have to keep track of the same inventory different locations with different codes, and if you really want a clear report, you’ll have to export the report into excel, bunch and merge some cells, and then you’ll finally come up with the report you want. So, basically, support for multiple locations means:
a. The ability to deploy the same software with the SAME data set relevant to the specific location;
b. The ability to have multiple users logged on simultaneously; and
c. The ability to manage the books of multiple locations separately and the business as a whole.
Now we’re asking for something as complex as SAP over here, but the concept is similar. And mind you, it’s not very complex. WebERP provides an example of a software that already does this, and even though some old school executives might still believe there are possible security breaches to storing information online, that’s a rather weak argument in today’s day and age.
I took apart WebERP with another colleague of mine to customize a multiple location accounting system for a client. It was about 70% complete, but as you know with clients in Dubai, they didn’t want to pay up as per the agreement, so we had to abandon the project. A web based solution is the SIMPLEST way to manage a multiple location accounting software. A web based solution that uses AJAX will totally eliminate the need for accounting software like SAGE or Peachtree. Writing such a software is on my list of things to do. But I wouldn’t hold me to that.
4. Viewing Vendor/Customer Statements. This wish is simply more of a musing, although I think it will be a useful musing. How is that we can (or could until the 2006 versions) only print these statements. I mean, how hard is it for QuickBooks or Peachtree to actually come up with another screen to display a customer or vendor statement before printing it out. It’s either the product of very lazy project management or careless programming. Either way, VIEWING before PRINTING is not only more convenient; it is also more environment-friendly.
================================================
Enough debunking of accounting software. Please feel free to add features to this wishlist as you deem fit. Mind you, I think most other things are already available in these accounting packages. It would be nice to be able to manage your bank account directly from the accounting software too, but let’s fact it, that’s not going to happen. Part TWO of this article will discuss which small business software is superior for small businesses, both from the accountants the business owner’s point of view.
Continue Reading
