USA:
Posted by Commie B on October 12, 2008 at 11:30 am
I haven’t written a whole lot of articles recently, owing primarily to the fact that I am putting together a new design for Asifism.com and completing an accounting and small business series of articles for the new section that goes with the new design.
However, I miss publicizing how pathetic the world we live in has become, hoping invain that maybe those of us who can afford to will take a step to curb the pitiable existence or retreat from the disaster that has become society.
I have previously been very critical of Britain. Cost of living, bad customer service, miserable people, etc. etc. But what has frustrated me most about this country, especially in the city of London, is the widespread level of incompetence and plain evil in the acts of the millions of people who inhabit the streets of London.
For those of you who are familiar with Ayn Rand, her philosophy of objectivism, and her masterpiece Atlas Shrugged, you may agree with me when I say that it is highly likely that Ayn Rand is looking down upon those of us who have an IQ of more than 50 with a cynical smile over her face suggesting, if not saying,”I told you so.” Her depiction of the world, and in specific New York City in Atlas Shrugged, so accurately depicts the current state of affairs in present day London (and possibly the rest of the world) that it is sadly fascinating.
What finally prompted me to write this article is the incident in London where an incompetent London Borough Council and its single digit IQ employees gave away a 7 bedroom GBP 12,000 per month house to a single Afghan mother with seven children with a net compensation of GBP 170,000 per year. To top all this off, the mother of 7 equated this waste of hard earned taxpayer money to winning the lottery and declaring it her right to have this house, with her probably shame of a son stating they had to turn down other houses because he needed room to park his car. Worst yet, this is a house that the Council should have been paying GBP 4,000 per month for, but because of their plain stupidity (the low IQ comes to mind here), they ended up paying some landlord GBP 12k per month.
In all fairness, in a society and city where people have some form integrity, the council employees should be dragged out to make an example of, the Afghan family should moved into a 1 or 2 bed council flat (with the sons put to work) and the landlord should be made to pay the GBP 8,000+ rent plus interest back to the council for extortion. But of course, all that would happen in a society where integrity and morality were important. In London, and in the UK, apparently, they are important no more.
Parliament is voting on whether parents should be allowed to slap their children. What a world! The police in this country is afraid of dealing with the children, the teachers in schools are petrified of children, and now, even the parents are not allowed to discipline them. Does anyone else see a problem here? This is supposed to be a first world country that others are supposed to look up to, yet the young and future of this country seems to lie in peril, crime, racism, and incompetence.
It is true, as was seen in Atlas Shrugged, that weight of the world, or the weight of any one society, is carried by the few in that society who really know what they are doing. 99% of the people are simply coasting along, mooching off of others, fighting, stealing, simply living. It is the 1% that strive to make a difference, and it is that 1% that makes the world go round and makes sure that the economy keeps ticking and 99% of the slack is able to eat three meals a day.
Today, the world has come to the point where politicians make meaningless statements in fancy language without saying anything of substance or dealing with any of the issues at hand. Take the presidential debate in the USA; it was a mere mudslinging content, and although Barrack Obama from time to time gave out some substance, ultimately, none of the important questions were dealt with. It has come to the point where politicians and people alike thing that throwing money and grandeur at a certain problem will resolve it. Pumping GBP 500 billion into the British economy will help save the banks; pumping US $ 700 billion into the US economy will help save the banks, but Ealing Council’s overspending to get someone a 7 bedroom, GBP 1.2 million is absolutely fine.
It is this mockery by government, this misuse of power, the pathetic attempts by futile minds to divert the attention of the simply minded population from the issues at hand (like possible corruption at councils, etc.), that so accurately resembles Rand’s depiction of the government in Atlas Shrugged. People who were absolutely incompetent were put in positions of power and paid massive amounts of money to basically talk shit and waste taxpayer money, running the country into the ground. That’s what Ealing Council here has done. The result, in a decent society, would be that the resident’s of that particular council stop paying all Council Tax. A government that misuses the power and money given to it should be stripped of all power and money. What ultimately happens is that the people who are paying the most amount of tax withdraw themselves from that society, thereby crippling the council or government. Of course, that happens where people have shame, morality and integrity. In Ealing, apparently, they don’t. I presume there are thousands of people paying massive amounts of rent in Ealing who cannot afford to have a car, when some stupid kid has the ordacity to refuse free housing because he cannot park his car.
To top it all off, these are supposed to be Muslims. Lashes then, is what such people who steal from others would deserve under Islamic Law. Maybe I haven’t gotten to the stage of withdrawal yet, but when I do, there may be nothing more entertaining than watching a society of incompetence and character flaws that struggles to survive when you can just sit back and watch. Disaster, for even something on such a small scale, if it continues to evolve, is inevitable.
I’m still not sure why Council Tax makes sense in the UK. The culture of something for nothing is what has killed this country, and it seems like nobody really cares about the country. Not the government, not the citizens, not the residents. Everybody is here to make a quick buck and nobody cares about the land that feeds them. Alas, this behavior will bring Atlas to his knees, even if he was simply shrugging in Rand’s depiction of the 60s.
I’m not even going to get into more details about how the financial rescue plan will or will not help the economy. At the rate of incompetence and corruption that’s currently rampant in this society and among others worldwide, I’m not sure if those who make up the Atlas in today’s world will put up with the weight of the world for too long. The lights may go out when Atlas Shrugs, but who knows what will happen when Atlas is brought to his knees.
Continue Reading
Posted by Commie B on July 17, 2008 at 10:11 pm
With the recent ‘sham’ election in Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe’s never ending shameless whore-like attitude, and his desperation to power, it is no surprise that the USA and UK have worked hard to impose sanctions and restrictions of Mugabe and his ‘terrorist’ rule, only to have their plans shot down the hole by Russia and China.
Why, but, some of the developed world wonders, have both Russia and China used their right to veto against imposing sanctions on the African crook? Is it because Russia and China support his crooked regime? Is it because they truly believe that whatever Mugabe does to the people of Zimbabwe is their own problem? No. If you actually bought into that political reason, well, maybe it is time to look a little deeper.
China and Russia’s reason to say no to imposing sanctions on Zimbabwe goes much deeper, and is much older, than the sham election and murderous regime of Robert Mugabe. The primary reason the sanctions were vetoed were as an answer to the United States of America; lately, if you haven’t noticed, everyone is tired of, in the words of the late George Carlin, tired of the US projecting their affairs into other people’s business. If it’s Zimbabwe today, it could be China or Russia tomorrow, and neither China nor Russia wants to go down that path, which is probably a smart thing, because such meddling in Russian or Chinese affairs could mean a world war. If you think Iran is the problem, well maybe you ought to sit back and have a look.
Iran, yes, given the recent exchange of dialog between Iran, the US, and Israel, it comes as no surprise that Russia or China will give the US no reason, or any encouragement to interfere in the business of other people. You see, unfortunately, the US claim and reasoning for not letting Iran become a nuclear power or achieve Uranium enrichment is no deeper than Israel. Its constant demand that Iran drop that plan is simply, well, stupid. If Israel can develop a nuclear weapon, why can’t Iran? The answer: simply because the US is bullying them, and some kids don’t deal well with bullies.
What America misses about Russia and China is that the enemy of an enemy is a friend, and enemies of the shape and form of Russia and China do not like being dictated terms too, which is why, in essence, that the US needs to shut its trap about Iran, let Israel deal with its own issues (which will not happen), so that other world powers stop looking at America as trying to be the big bully, but actually perceive her as a big, responsible power. It is this attitude of the US, and cheesy counterplay by Russia and China, which will, sadly, make it worse for the Zimbabweans. It’s a pity what has happened there, and we would hope that China and Russia acted less politically, and more in a humanitarian way, as we would hope that the US tries less to intimidate others and gain their respect, which would probably have been more effective here.
Continue Reading
Posted by Commie B on March 31, 2008 at 2:26 am
Well, you could say that’s because London is London and New York is New York. Let’s be honest: in the last few years I’ve heard and read various things like London stealing the financial business from New York City, London seeing more growth, London becoming a better all over experience due to immigration and America’s terrorist obsession, etc. etc. But, lets face it, London does not give you the experience New York does, and it never will. Why? Let’s see why.
Filth / Garbage
Well, I’ve been to New York City several times, and I’m not saying it’s like Singapore, but hey, it’s relatively clean, especially when compared to London. Have you seen the trash on the streets of London lately? What’s with all the chewing gum stains on the pavements and the roads? I don’t think New York has that kind of a stain infested issue, does it?
Then, how come people aren’t supposed to clean their dog poo and pee? What in the world is that about? I know this is the land of royalty, but can we please tell people to clean up after their pets? It’s only polite.
Mind you, I’m not saying New York is immaculate, but unless it has become filthier the last few years, I certainly don’t remember it being this dirty. I mean have you been to Marble Arch, Edgware, or Edgware Road lately? I’m sorry, but Edgware reminded me of Karachi for a minute!
Customer Service, you say?
Okay, call me spoilt, but the American saying “the customer is always right” does have its treats. It is so frustrating when you walk into a store in London that no one really gives a damn. The quality of service is horrible. Have you ever been to a bank in London? No one is at the counter, and you have to wait for more than 5 minutes before someone will come to attend to you. It’s the same everywhere you go. Cell phone stores, grocery stores, restaurants, banks, offices, etc., the service is nothing short of horrible.
Customer Service staff, that takes less interest in their lives than probably anyone does, try and lecture you on things like the Data Protection Act and other laws, when they really have no idea what they are talking about. Everyone has an excuse for doing something the wrong way, and no one needs an excuse for not doing anything! It’s a privilege to to get any kind of service in London when you are paying for it. Be it NatWest, Barclays, HSBC, Orange, O2 or any other business, their customer service sucks, which makes for a very unpleasant shopping or service experience.
The US is great at this. I don’t know if it’s because of the out-of-whack US liability laws or simply because they’re smart enough to know that happy customers make good customers, but they do everything it takes to get the job done right. I’m not saying that the level of customer service competence is better in the US, but New York makes for a much more pleasant shopping experience than London. Ask any Brit who’s been to New York. They only have good things to say about it. So many of them want to move there, despite what they think of George Bush and US foreign policy. Well, who can blame them, right?
Ofcourse, outsourcing of customer service over the phone is a problem in both cities/countries. But given the fact that the liability of bad service in the US is greater than it is in the UK, US outsourced customer service is much better. I guess this strings from the fact that no major corporations in the US are government owned or government vested, as British Telecom is, say, in the UK.
Who’s more friendly? New Yorkers or Londoners?
Everyone in London is upset most of the time. This may be due to traffic, poverty, expenditure, tourists, or whatever. But hey, New Yorkers are just as fed up of the crap at their end. But my experience is that Americans are generally much more friendly than the British. In school, we used to read of British Hospitality and all that good stuff. Well, most of it has apparently faded, at least in the working class. Who knows why that is. I guess life in London is more difficult than in New York City, which makes for crankier Londoners than New Yorkers.
If you’ve seen the phrase “Welcome to New York” used in movies when something goes wrong with someone in New York, well, it is just as suitable for London, if not more. But maybe Londoners don’t share the same sense of humour!
Rowdy Kids
Okay, this has a lot to do with the low drinking age and the excessive use of drugs. That’s just not cool, because kids get rowdy and rude and puke all over the place in London, which ads more to the existing dirt, which isn’t cool either. I’m not going say too much about this, except that this needs to stop, and infusion of drugs into London teenagers needs to be controlled urgently, because this is not only a hassle for us who live here, but even for those who are visiting for fun.
The Fascination Factor
This may be subjective, but I clearly remember the first time I visited NYC (let’s not count Brooklyn or Queens, shall we?). I stepped out of the Subway Station o 5th Avemue and I stood in awe at skyscraper after skyscraper. The impression that New York makes on a new or first time visitor is far superior to the one that London makes, and Londoners will tell you that. New York is a City that’s built to look like a Metropolis, and it certainly feels like one. London may have big city life, but I think it fails to make that impression that adds to the initial buzz of being in one of the world’s most dynamic cities.
Food
Oh my! New York City has more variety in food than London does. New York City’s portion size is much larger (as is the rest of America’s), and the cost is far less. Also, since I think Americans are far more passionate about eating (compare the obesity rate between the US and UK at 38% and 33 %, respectively), the overall taste and experience of dining and food in New York City is better than in London.
And for those of you who say Americans pig out and don’t enjoy their food, well, the obesity gap isn’t that much, and here is news for some of you: New York City is the world’s first city to ban trans fat in restaurants. That’s right. I think the law kicks in in June, but now who cares more about the health of tourists and residents?
Bloomberg Vs. Livingstone
Come on now, there’s no comparison. The New York Mayor (Michael Bloomberg) is much cooler than London Mayor Ken Livingstone. Bloomberg, that just sounds much cooler than Livingstone. Need I say more?
The Experience (Corporate, mostly)
After having lived in the US for several years (and not really having lived in New York), I think that London, and forgive me for saying this, is like an American village. I’ve already mentioned that London doesn’t feel as Metropolitan as New York; but even Denver or Dallas feel more metropolitan than London. Well, maybe I’ll discount Dallas from that.
There are many reasons for that, but I think a lot of it has to do with British mentality and culture.
The Corporate Culture of London is, at best, outdated, compared to the corporate culture anywhere in the US. The technology in use, the ideology, the methodology all is about 20-25 years behind the US. I think the reason for that is the traditional approach of British Businessmen. They like to stick to what they’re comfortable with, and then British pride knows no end. Since the UK isn’t exactly the pioneer of new technology or British methodologies, British business is hesitant about adapting to it, with the result say, if the CEO or Managing Director of a major corporation has been in charge for 10 years, he technology in place is 10 years old. Until a younger crowd comes to manage the company, the technology won’t change, because each generation, I think, in this country, brings an update to technology and methodologies.
That’s not the case in the US, which is a dynamic environment that thrives on new processes, technologies, and methodologies. Things are always being improved, with the ultimate goal to weed out inefficiencies in the business processes.
When I was in the US, I used to hear how much ahead of the US Europe was in the cell phone market. Well, not really. Just because the US has a different release schedule for mobile phones and they use different cell phone networks doesn’t make their service or technology inferior. London has more mobile/cell phone signal problems than I ever had in the US driving from Colorado to New York. So, you shouldn’t really believe every such thing you hear.
In addition, the US, to this day, and even NYC, provides a positive corporate culture for new entrants. It is an environment where you can get a job or thrive on merit alone, at least upto a comfortable level, if not a super rich level. In London, merit doesn’t really count; you have to know people to get to even very junior places, and that kind of stuff is just not cool. But I think, again, it is something that comes out of the culture of royalty, and although it may be a bad thing, it has become a way of life that the locals are used to. More power to them! I guess as long as you know who you know, what you know is not really important.
Let’s just say that I’m trying to say that the Business Acumen of London is nowhere close to that of New York, or any other major US city. That doesn’t mean the London economy is very small, we’re just talking about business acumen and business intelligence.
Price
In a few words, New York provides MUCH BETTER value for money than London does. Living, shopping, partying, everything in New York City is half price of what it is in London. Throw in the other factors mentioned, and New York makes for a far superior experience.
Okay, this may not have been the most comprehensive guide to London and New York, but it’s just my opinion, which means it may be prejudiced, biased,or simply ill founded. But nonetheless, it is my opinion. Personally, I preferred Denver. It had most of the advantages of a big city without the rutt and problems. But then, it’s neither London nor New York.
What do you think?
Loading ...
Posted by Commie B on February 28, 2008 at 5:35 pm
I recently read in an article published in a British Magazine which stated that the fact that Obama is leading the polls over Hillary Clinton, and it appears will most likely beat her, is proof of the fact that America is no more a racist society; well, maybe not as racist as it used to be a few decades ago. On the other hand, another gentleman, who was interviewed in the article, stated that it’s not that America is no more racist, it’s just that America has learnt to deal with the racial problem better.
That may well be true, but it appears that America is no more interested in the (at this point democratic) political ideologies of the mature, white person. But is that the only reason that Obama is winning? The simple fact that he’s young, and black, and has a different attitude toward most things than, say, the Clintons or the Edwards or the Kerrys? Probablt not.
But here’s what I can tell you. If you read the news, the interviews, the poll results, the poll analysis, political experts, etc. etc., it seems like the US public has become so fed-up of the corruption in the White House, that at this point they’re willing to take up new blood, new blood that’s different, that won’t change his/her mind every now and then, and new blood that may offer something new. The new part is key, because we’ve all seen what the Bush’s are capable of doing; between father and son, they’ve done it for almost 16 years, and America is more than hurting because of that.
The one simplest reason why Obama is leading the presidential race ahead of Hillary Clinton and John McCain (who looks like he’s angry all the time; maybe he should be checked into anger management or something) is because he is NEW. People don’t know what he will do or what he can do, and people are desperate. They have seen what the white folk have done (no racism meant), and they’re willing to take their chances with what NEW brings, because with white they now have to associate the sadistic presidential rule of President George W. Bush. That’s a distaster, for both Clinton and McCain.
But there are other reasons why Barrack Obama may win the US Elections. Despite the attempts of Hillary Clinton and John McCain to defame him on the public financing / funding issue, these are not serious enough allegations to damage his credibility. With Iraq being a failure, Hillary Clinton’s former stance of supporting the war has from the very first day put her on very questionable grounds. John McCain is all about war; civil, international, world. He’s a war-like people, and he’s too traditional, which again gives Barrack Obama an edge. Obama, on the other hand, never voted for the Iraq War, and that gives him the only head start he needs in addition to being NEW.
What plays against Obama, however, is the lack of confidence people have in the leadership of black people. The same article also discussed the fact that although people are all for new and all for Obama, they are slightly hesitant, because they think that since a black man has never been a president, can he do it? White people have been becoming US Presidents for the last 200 years, and they’re bred for it. But is a black man educated, complicated, and charismatic enough to lead America. Well, we’re going to find out, won’t we?
I’m not voting, since I’m not a US National and don’t live in the US. But tell me, who do you think will win the election eventually? Not who’s best, who do you think will become commander and chief?
Loading ...
Posted by Commie B on March 11, 2007 at 2:29 pm
This page has been produced from a post due to it’s popularity. The link to the original post is http://www.asifism.com/?p=39.
You can still add more discussion and comments as needed. You can also contact me if you have any questions regarding this process.
KEYWORDS for this page: ICE, Deportation, Process, Deporting, Deportee, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Deportees from America, US Deportation, Immigration, US, USA, United States, getting deported from the US, US Deportation process.
Here goes:
Have a relative or friend who is getting deported from the US? Plan on being in the same position anytime soon? Well, here it is, for the first time, a fully documented and procedural guide to US detention and deportation. Please note that you will NOT find this information anywhere else. Half the practiced procedure during this process is NOT published anywhere under the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) or Immigration & Nationality Act (INA). That’s primarily because no one has taken interest in this procedure, and although there are manuals published by the House and Congress on the process of deportation and escorting illegal aliens out of the US, they are NOT followed by the monkeys at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The reason for that is that immigration law and procedure largely deals with people who are not US citizens, so the US government, house, or congress doesn’t give a flying fuck about them. Some of this is in violation of human rights, but who gives a fuck? If you’re not white and don’t hold a blue passport, you don’t deserve to be treated with dignity, do you? After all, America was formed after the murder of brown people wasn’t it? Anyway, think I’m getting off the topic here. Here’s how it works:
How it Begins
The person who homeland security wants to deport is picked up. Please keep in mind that the pick-up is made not by the USCIS or Immigration Services, but by Customs and Border Patrol, or, most likely, by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The ICE is equivalent to the right testicle of the US Department of Homeland Security for enforcement of Immigration and related unlawful DHS policy and practice. They basically do the “dirty work” for the immigration fogies. So, if someone you know simply disappears off of the streets of America, or they go to see someone at the local immigration service center, or go for an Infopass appointment (http://infopass.uscis.gov/) and never turn up, guess what, they’ve been arrested. Please note that ICE is present at all Immigration Service Centers for this very reason: the arrest of those people they consider illegal. Whether they are OR not is neither their business nor that of the USCIS. A US court has to decide that, and good luck getting there. Not many people that chance; so America’s advertising about a free country is basically full of shit in this department.
So, how do you find out if someone has been picked up? Visit the local immigration office, and ask them where they hold immigration detainees. You’ll get a couple of printed pages from http://www.mapquest.com directions on them, which will be addresses of the “facilities” or jails that people are taken to when detained. Call them, ask for your party’s name, and you’ll know if they are there or not. Now, you can’t speak to the person who has been arrested. THEY need to call you; then you call back and set up a collect call system that costs you both your arms and a leg, and then the arrested person call you from inside the jail.
So now they’re in, and you’re contacting attorneys, and your friend is trying to extract information from the people who arrested him; what the hell is going on? Read on…
After the Arrest
Now is when the false assurances start. First of, ICE Officers will hardly ever talk to you or an Immigration Attorney. They think you’re the scum of the earth because you’re not white enough for them, and your attorney is equally pathetic because he/she is defending you. So, they will not give you any information. They may, however, give the arrested some false information about when he’ll be deported, but they will never actually tell you when, where, or how, because it’s supposed to be a ‘security risk.’ Yes, the small penis’ of the ICE Officers are at stake; they need to make the most of their petty 2 cents worth lives and they make everything sound like it’s top secret information that could change the course of the earth.
Typically, the ICE can hold a deportee for about 3 months before they’ll need special permission from other authorities to further hold the person, and because that special permission requires paperwork (which the dickheads are too fucking incompetent to do) and may establish that the ICE has ILLEGALLY or UNLAWFULLY arrested someone (this is very common), they will typically deport your arrested friend or relative within those 90 days.
If he/she has a committed a crime, the 90 day period will begin after they have done jail time for their crime. They will then be moved to a federal deportee detention facility. You can find a list of detention facilities and related information here:
http://www.ice.gov/pi/dro/facilities.htm.
If you believe an ICE Officer has arrested you by mistake, there’s really nothing you can about it. If you had a stay issued by a Court, you can file for a contempt of court. Also, you can file a Habeas Corpus with the court to request that the ICE officer be questioned and you be released. However, it seems like the system is rigged; ICE apparently feeds enough money to US Department of Justice (USDOJ) to where they don’t entertain such applications or cannot take action on them within 90 days, and that basically renders them useless. What you can do, however, is file a civil suit and get the media involved. That’s the only thing that scares the US government, and typically, this is more than an ICE Officer can handle, and somewhere somebody will always pay for fucking up. However, this is not something everyone can do as it may require some serious cash and persistence, and a lot of courage. After all, a lot of people unnecessarily tremble in the name of US Homeland Security.
The Deportation Process
This, in itself, is a big mess. There’s no set procedure or way. Typically, here’s the rule: If there’s a direct flight to your country of passport from anywhere in the US, you will be flown on either a US government plane or escorted on a commercial flight to the major international airport that such a flight will fly out of. From this airport, you will be put on a commercial flight ‘home.’ They will hand the passport over to the pilot or airline staff, and they will hand it over to you when you land or are on the plane, unless you’re from a really crooked country where these people are looking to make a quick buck off of you.
Now, according to the guide for escorting, information on which can be found on the USDOJ site at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/INS/e0105/index.htm, if no one if the deportee in question has not committed a crime, he/she does not need an escort. But somehow it turns out that homeland security has a very hard time complying with this manual or guide, and so, the rule is typically ignored.
Now, I’m not sure if this is how it’s done in other countries too, but I know this is how it works for the Middle East and Pakistan. Most likely, the deportee will be moved to the federal detention facility in Buffalo, NY, from where the ICE charters a plane belonging to any airline, and flies in a 24 hour plus flight to three or four countries, dropping the deportees off. The idea is to hand them over to local authorities, but most local authorities could give a fuck less about what the ICE wants them to do. In fact, there have been reports of ICE and Homeland Security Officers getting into trouble upon arrival in the Pakistan without having an invitation; something to be proud of.
The Return to the Passport Country
Once your deportee lands in Pakistan, he’ll be uncuffed and brought into the airport. The problem here is that the US flight is so secretive, that they don’t even inform the local authorities of the arrival of a deportee plane, with the result that the local authorities are not prepared. The only people who may have a clue about the flight is the air traffic control room staff, and they typically don’t communicate the information with the FIA (in Pakistan) or the FBI equivalent of the country the deportees are landing.
The result: deportees are hung up at the airport for a couple of hours for filling out a survey form after which they are let go. For Pakistan, the flight usually lands in Islamabad. For all other countries, it typically lands in the capital city. The last deportee flight that few from NY and ended in Pakistan flew on Tuesday, March 6, with a stop in Jordan, after which it carried to Islamabad, Pakistan.
Conclusion
What’s the worst part about this process?
- The inhumane treatment of deportees, some of whom may be highly educated officials who are simply put behind bars for making a solid, legitimate case against the USCIS or ICE but have the wrong skin color.
- The lack of information and pathetic secrecy issues.
- The hiding of ICE officers from lawyers and other genuine people for fucking up; talk about being American, don’t face your mistakes or stand up for what you do. Way to go Dick in Bush!
- The lack of implementation of legislature and the cowardice of judiciary in front of ICE.
- Thousands of human rights violations.
- The incompetence of American Citizens in realizing that there are such atrocities going on inside their own country, and
- The fact that no one is willing to do anything about it because the mistreated don’t hold American Passports.
What can we say? What goes around comes around. Stay away and don’t get involved. This is one of the several ways the US is shooting herself in her own foot, and what happens when you do that? You only need to be told if you have never stepped outside the US.
Continue Reading
